In conclusion, the concept of reasonable care is an essential consideration in negligence cases. If you have suffered harm due to someone else’s negligence, it is crucial to seek the assistance of an experienced attorney who can evaluate your case and help you pursue compensation for your injuries.
Wrongful Death Attorneys. Lawyer Ben Roberts.
Reasonable Care in Negligence and Liability Legal Cases
Reasonable care is the standard of care that a reasonable person in a similar situation would exercise to prevent harm to others. The failure to exercise reasonable care can lead to a finding of negligence and liability for any harm caused to another person.
In many situations, the level of reasonable care required can vary depending on the circumstances of each case.
For example, professionals such as doctors have a higher duty of care due to their specialized knowledge and training. In such cases, a higher standard of care may be required.
Several examples of reasonable care and its application in case law are provided. In the medical malpractice case of Hernandez v. Hacienda HealthCare, the hospital was found negligent for failing to monitor a newborn baby’s vital signs and not responding to the mother’s concerns, leading to the baby’s death. In the car accident case of Estate of Trigg v. Ford Motor Company, the auto manufacturer was found negligent for failing to provide proper safety features in the vehicle, specifically for not addressing a faulty seatbelt. In the workplace accident case of Haynes and Boone, LLP v. Dresser, Inc., the construction company was found negligent for failing to provide proper safety equipment and training, resulting in an employee’s injury. In the defective products case of Estate of Jacqueline Fox v. Johnson & Johnson, the pharmaceutical company was found negligent for failing to warn consumers about the potential health risks associated with their talcum powder product. In the premises liability case of Foust v. Walt Disney World Co., the rental property management company and property owner were found negligent for failing to provide proper safety measures and warnings about a pool where a 3-year-old boy drowned.